Full assurance report

Redgate Motorway Upgrade · Board 10, met 2 Jul 2026

It covers Kelvane and Marrick Group only. Read from 4,969 sources, last read 07:12.

Behaviour score

71/100

▼ 4 since Board 9

How Kelvane and Marrick behave towards each other.

Drifts with Marrick

4 Raise it

Commitments with Marrick

1 blind spot

Summary

Agreed ways of working are changing without a joint decision.

If nothing changes, the approved minutes will say open-book reviews happen only “where practicable”.

The Behaviour score is 71/100, down 4 since Board 9.

Behavioural scorecard

The Behaviour score averages seven parts. Each is read from this board's record.

Part	Score	Since Board 9
Keeping commitments◐	62	▼ 5
Openness◐	66	▼ 5
Joint governance◐	74	▼ 4
Fair dealing◐	70	▼ 4
Conflict conduct◐	81	▼ 3
Engagement and responsiveness◐	73	▼ 4
Relational investment◐	72	▼ 4
Behaviour score	71	▼ 4

The parts carry equal weight. ◐ means Immota can’t read all of a part yet. The unread measures are left out, not scored zero.

Commitments with Marrick Group

Every commitment with Marrick Group, read against its recent checks. A check is a time the record shows it kept or not.

10 commitments · 4 to raise · 3 drifting · 2 on track · 1 blind spot

Commitment	State	Recent checks
Share a change to a shared specification before adopting it, and assess it jointlyCharter · Principle 4	Raise it	Kept in 2 of its last 8 checkswas 5 of 8
Maintain the resourcing for its agreed share of the worksJV Deed cl. 9.2	Raise it	Kept in 0 of its last 4 checks
Give a monthly open-book review of actual costs, across every cost categoryJV Deed cl. 12.4	Raise it	Kept in 3 of its last 10 checkswas 6 of 10
Send the named senior executive to the monthly JV boardJoint RMP §2	Raise it	Kept in 3 of its last 10 checkswas 8 of 10
Keep the partner interface register up to date together, and review it at each boardJV Deed cl. 6.3	Drifting	Kept in 4 of its last 10 checkswas 6 of 10
Answer the other partner's written queries within five working daysJoint RMP §5	Drifting	Kept in 5 of its last 8 checkswas 9 of 10
Raise emerging problems early, before they hardenCharter · Principle 5	Drifting	Kept in 5 of its last 10 checkswas 7 of 10
Send the monthly programme cost report by the fifth business dayJV Deed cl. 7.1	On track	No counts
Go to the Principal as one team, with one positionCharter · Principle 2	On track	Kept in 9 of its last 10 checkswas 9 of 10
Make joint compliance attestations each periodJV Deed cl. 11.2	Blind spot	No source reads it yet

The counts set the state. 70% or more kept is On track. 40% to under 70% is Drifting. Under 40% is Raise it. With no counts, the worst open drift sets it.

The scorecard’s Keeping commitments also counts actions, milestones and decisions.

Drifts with Marrick Group

Every drift with Marrick still on the record, worst first.

Raise it
Vent spec revised and installed without joint assessment
What was agreed: A change to a shared technical specification that affects the other partner's works, cost or programme is shared before it is adopted, and jointly assessed through the interface register.
What happened: Marrick adopted vent spec rev C and installed it without a joint assessment. The tunnel now has two vent types. Neither the interface register nor the risks register mentions the change. Air-pressure and circulation calculations for sections 4 and 5 now need rework.
Raise it
Partner resourcing softened and breached
What was agreed: Each partner shall maintain the resourcing needed to deliver its agreed share of the works, and any change to the workshare split requires the written agreement of both partners.
What happened: Marrick's crews have run at 58% of the agreed level for four updates in a row. Nobody raised a deed variation. The draft minutes of board 10 now say resourcing will be 'balanced across the programme as practicable'.
Raise it
Open-book review guarantee softened in the draft minutes
What was agreed: Each partner guarantees a monthly open-book review of its actual project costs to the other partner, across every cost category.
What happened: The draft minutes of board 10 record open-book reviews 'to be provided where practicable'. Two cost categories were missing from the last open-book pack.
Raise it
Marrick's senior executive has stopped coming to the JV board
What was agreed: Each partner names a senior executive responsible for the relationship, who attends the monthly JV board.
What happened: Marrick's named senior executive came to boards 4 to 7. A delegate came from board 8. At board 10, neither came. Leadership attention dropped two boards before the delivery numbers moved.
Drifting
Marrick has stopped updating the partner interface register
What was agreed: The partner interface register is jointly maintained and reviewed at each board.
What happened: Marrick hasn't added to the partner interface register in five weeks. A live tie-in risk sits in its own records, off the joint register.
DriftingYour side
Kelvane's reply to Marrick's tie-in query is overdue
What was agreed: Each partner answers a written query from the other within five working days, or within that time says when it will.
What happened: Marrick's query IQ-047 on the tie-in set-out levels reached Kelvane on 16 June. The reply was due by 23 June. Kelvane hasn't answered or given a date. Marrick chased it on 1 July.

What Immota can read

Way in	State	What it brings
From the meetings	Not yet	Immota can't join meetings yet. It reads the minutes instead.
From the email	Connected	The JV governance mailbox forwards to Immota. Letters to the Principal copy it in.
From the shared drive	Connected	The JV's project folder is shared with Immota. Progress, open-book and register reports are saved there too.

Immota can read 93% of what goes into the Behaviour score. Measures it can’t read are left out, not scored zero. A connected channel that finds nothing still counts as a reading.

Immota reads 9 of the 10 commitments with Marrick Group. 1 is a blind spot: no source reads it yet.

Open actions

3 actions on these drifts are still open.

Table a joint impact assessment of VS-2104 rev C at Board 11 and raise the deed variation
Dave Marchetti · due 30 Jul 2026
For: Vent spec revised and installed without joint assessment
Table a resourcing recovery plan and formal deed variation at the Board 10 review
Dave Marchetti · due 9 Jul 2026
For: Partner resourcing softened and breached
Restate the JV Deed cl. 12.4 open-book guarantee in the final minutes, and reschedule this month's review
Dave Marchetti · due 10 Jul 2026
For: Open-book review guarantee softened in the draft minutes